Cases 81 - 90 of 166
Ward v. Orange County et al
as 1:2017cv09717
Plaintiff:
J'min A. Ward
Defendant:
Orange County and Craig Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tutora v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv09517
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Tutora
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, Sgt. Gessner #138, Sgt. D.R. MCcord #119 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McWillis v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 1:2017cv06606
Plaintiff:
David McWillis
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercado v. Orange County Corrections Department et al
as 6:2017cv01336
Plaintiff:
Louis Angel Mercado
Defendant:
Orange County Corrections Department, Orange County Corrections Health Services Department, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McWillis v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv04805
Plaintiff:
David McWillis
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, Correct Care Solutions Inc, Sorrel Feldman, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Orange County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv02701
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Orange County Correctional Facility, Melendorf and Colonel Kenneth Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keplinger v. Orange County Jail et al
as 6:2016cv02222
Plaintiff:
James Keplinger
Defendant:
Orange County Jail and City of Orlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv01249
Plaintiff:
BARTHOLOMEW R. SCOTT
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ORANGE COUNTY JAIL, IVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. ORANGE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv01097
Plaintiff:
BARTHOLOMEW R. SCOTT
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siles v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Shana Glenn Siles
Defendant:
Orange County Jail and Asia Beams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
