Cases 81 - 90 of 5,398
ANDERSON v. SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Defendant:
JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE and BRIAN COCKERHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. GRAY et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
WARDEN MR. GRAY, CAPTAIN MR. BURGESS, UNIT MANAGER MR. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD, OFC. GLASSCOCK, WELLPATH, LLC d/b/a/ CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragin v. Lockwood et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Errie Ragin
Defendant:
Shekina Lockwood and NC Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coble v. Blackburn
as 5:2024ct03065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coble
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Brian Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Bynum
as 5:2024ct03096
Plaintiff:
Telyzuan Ja'Keith Hawkins
Defendant:
Lt. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kalinowski et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Williams
Defendant:
FNU Kalinowski, Melissa Becker and Charles Bumgarner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
