Cases 1 - 10 of 5,419
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stone v. Director of BOP et al
as 5:2024ct03158
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stone
Defendant:
Director of BOP and NC DAC Prison Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELTON v. GILLENWATER et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
RUFUS ALEXANDER HELTON
Defendant:
GEORGE GILLENWATER and PATRICK MCCRARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAUSE v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
WALTER TIMOTHY GAUSE
Defendant:
RONALD COVINGTON, UNIT MANAGER NEALEY, S BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACK v. HACKETT et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAMION MACK
Defendant:
MR. HACKETT, MR. GLECK and MS. FORDHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas v. Bartlett et al
as 5:2024ct03157
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Defendant:
Duane H. Bartlett, Malik Clyburn, Harnett Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Hicks
as 5:2024ct03156
Plaintiff:
Justin Morrow
Defendant:
Tara Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
KEITH K. CARTER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN CHAMBERS
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, LT. STULTZ, LT. CUUZZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Walsh et al
as 5:2024ct03154
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
Sergeant Walsh, Correctional Officer Sculley, Sergeant Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
