Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Golden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Eric Golden
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Green, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessinger v. Yes Care et al
as 6:2022cv02418
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kessinger
Defendant:
Yes Care, Wayne Ivey and Chief Singletary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Wellpath Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Patrick A. Kessinger, Wellpath Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Johnson v. Sandage et al
as 1:2020cv01310
Defendant:
. Cook, . Hitchins, Eugeniy Fuss and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Hughes et al
as 1:2020cv01261
Defendant:
McLean County Detention Facility, Melinda Fuller, . Proctor and others
Plaintiff:
Lakendra Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Losey v. Raju Paturi, et al
as 13-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LOSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAJU PATURI, Psychiatrist - Private and Employed by McLean County Jail, MIKE EMERY, Sheriff, GREG ALLEN, Superintendent and others
Merritte v. Templeton et al
as 1:2011cv02458
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Merritte
Defendant:
Thomas Templeton, Art Preci, Jason Edgcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte v. Templeton et al
as 1:2010cv05163
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Merritte
Defendant:
Thomas Templeton, Tina Wright-Stachowiak, Shelley Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
