Cases 1 - 10 of 535
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Defendant:
John Hamm, Wendy Williams, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Houston Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Sgt. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Carvell Tony Brown
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Captain Walker, Lt. Corcino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Cronin et al
as 5:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffery Cronin and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nix v. Hutton et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Daric L Nix
Defendant:
John Hutton and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Curtis Caldwell
Defendant:
John Hamm, Dr. Thomas, Scotty Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. Willison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Willison and Officer Frooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James L Stone
Defendant:
John Hamm and Scotty Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holifield v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Holifield
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Cordell Clark
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Franetta Riley, Tavores Surles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
