Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Harkness et al
as 2:2022cv02271
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carpenter
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnathan Harkness, Joshua Crom, Rob Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Shelby County Sheriff et al
as 2:2021cv02736
Plaintiff:
DaRunn Turner
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff, District Attorney's Office, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Weirich et al
as 2:2021cv02675
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Patton
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Judge Mitchell, W. Mark Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Judge Chris Craft, Attorney James Jones, District Attorney Amy Weirich and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Shelby County Sherrifs Dep et al
as 2:2020cv02036
Defendant:
Shelby County Sherrifs Dep, Officer Ewing, Sherrif Bonner and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Laverne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden v. Kuhn et al
as 2:2019cv02669
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Bobby Carter, Floyd Bonner and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2018cv02303
Plaintiff:
Terrance S. Knox
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Jail, Criminal Court Division 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Weirich, et al
as 2:2018cv02154
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Jenkins
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Oldham, Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
