Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. Appling County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eugene Smith
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center and Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Appling County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Brunswick Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Brunswick Judicial Circuit, Stephen G. Scarlett, Sr., Brunswick District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brunswick Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Brunswick Judicial Circuit, Mark Melton, Appling County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, Stephanie Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 5:2019cv00209
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, LEAD NURSE STEPHANIE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APPLING v. COX
as 5:2018cv00444
Plaintiff:
SHA'RODNEY APPLING
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Appling County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Waymon D. Shaw
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center, Adam Bell, Mark Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocampo v. Appling Healthcare System et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ocampo
Defendant:
Appling Healthcare System and Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dasher v. Eunice et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Danny Dashaun Dasher
Defendant:
Robert Eunice, Toyna Carter and The Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
