Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Branch v. Jacksonville Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
La'Ryeus Quintez Branch
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriffs Office, Officer Long, Officer Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Shan Collins, C.O. Reed, Sgt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller, Terrell Amerson, Paul Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carjuan Adkins v. Richard Watson, et al
as 22-1532
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARJUAN D. ADKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD WATSON, DELANCEY MOORE, III, JANELLE BLOODWORTH and others
Tammons v. St. Clair County Jail
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Cathy MacElroy, Janelle Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Defendant:
C.O. Sabo, Sgt. Scott, Shan Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn LaFollette, Cameron Belk, Sr., Roderick Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hurst v. Witz et al
as 1:2019cv00548
Defendant:
Judge, Witz, Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kersten et al
as 3:2018cv01436
Defendant:
State's Attorney Bloodworth, Cpl. Swift, Mr. Brashears and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodworth v. Satchel et al
as 5:2018ct03091
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Bloodworth
Defendant:
Mrs. Satchel and Mr. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bibbs v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
A.J. Samuel Bibbs
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Ruiz Rungle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv07400
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ybarra
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Nneka Jones Tapia, Debbie Boecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
