Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Perkins v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 7:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
Terry L Perkins
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Bibb County Correctional Facility and Mrs Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2021cv00455
Defendant:
Warden and Bibb County Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Wonne Robinson
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Consenta v. Dunn et al
as 7:2020cv01258
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Jimmy Thomas, Brent, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Kelandus Consenta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Ivey et al
as 7:2020cv00408
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Collins
Defendant:
Bibb County Corrections Facility and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Hines et al (INMATE 1)
as 7:2020cv00133
Defendant:
C.O. Cutts, Jr., Officer Anes, C.O. Cutts, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Hines et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01045
Defendant:
C.O. Cutts, Jr., Officer Anes, C.O. Cutts, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Alabama Dept of Correction et al
as 7:2019cv00480
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Defendant:
Loxley Work Center/Release, Alabama Dept of Correction, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stripling v. Tomson et al (INMATE 1)
as 7:2019cv00239
Defendant:
Warden Tomson, C.O. Cutts, Jr., Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Stripling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stripling v. Tomson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Warden Tomson, C.O. Cutts, Jr., Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Stripling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
