Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John McKinney v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-6509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MCKINNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director SCDC, TERRE MARSHALL, Deputy Director SCDC/Health, CECELIA REYNOLDS, Warden Lee Correctional Institution and others
Porterfield v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Keith B. Porterfield
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan P. Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroud v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02892
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stroud
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denon D Carson, Jr. v. Cecelia Reynold
as 14-7678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENON D CARSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CECELIA REYNOLDS and PHILIPS RIGGINS
Defendant:
JERRY WASHINGTON
McKenny v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2013cv00403
Plaintiff:
Yandell McKenny
Defendant:
Cecelia Reynolds, Jerry Washington, Derrick Seward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hill v. Reynolds et al
as 6:2011cv00359
Plaintiff:
Curtis Rena Hill
Defendant:
Cecelia Reynolds and Pamela Hough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenny v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
Yandell McKenny
Defendant:
Cecelia Reynolds, J Washington and Derrick Seward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
Ramie Koji Fleming
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , George T Hagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
Ramie Koji Fleming
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint, George T Hagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
