Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crittenden v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Clifford L. Crittenden
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Clifford Sinclair Madison
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Mr. Williams and Mr. Limpkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Melchaske et al
as 2:2020cv01814
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Gaines, Tunswall and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbee v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00682
Plaintiff:
Clifford Barbee
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Gwathney et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Clifford Walker and Leigh Gwathney
Plaintiff:
Kendall Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Aaron et al
as 2:2019cv00513
Defendant:
Clifforde Sutton, Samuel Aaron, John Roders and others
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo T Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cook
Defendant:
Derrick Carter, John Crow, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Clifford Bernard Ellis
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00459
Petitioner:
Clifford Cooke
Respondent:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
