Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Brown v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv01623
Plaintiff:
Christopher Angelo Brown
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Shinn, John McAdorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred Caraffa v. Joe Biden, et al
as 22-16137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA, AKA Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as United States, ARIZONA, STATE OF and others
Enabnit v. Ducey et al
as 4:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
John E Enabnit
Defendant:
Doug Ducey and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Alfred E Caraffa and Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Joe Biden, United States of America, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wauneka #082558 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Delbert Wauneka
Defendant:
David Shinn, Doug Ducey, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staples v. Ducey, et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
James Staples
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Shinn, Jeffrey Van Winkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01603
Plaintiff:
Renee Richards
Defendant:
David Shinn, Doug Ducey, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Egler v. USA, et al
as 21-15940
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRET SERVICE, MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PAUL PENZONE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SILVANUS EGLER
Allen et al v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00933
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Doug Ducey, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Alexander Aguilar, James L Phillips, Anor M Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00973
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Daniel Town, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
David Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
