Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rathy v. Rendell, et al
as 10-3120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE FRANKLIN RATHY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ATTY GEN PA, Esquire, Office of the Attorney General, JEFFREY B. MILLER, Commissioner and others
SMITH v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv01579
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY QUINDERZ SMITH
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHRIES v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUMPHRIES
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Crumb, et al
as 09-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS, Sovereign
Defendant - Appellee:
CRUMB, VOJACEK, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
CARRASQUILLO v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv00347
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARRASQUILLO
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUTTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
HEATH LEE SUTTON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WESLEY v. GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
as 3:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ronald Williams v. Sharon Sebek, et al
as 08-2307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN E. ANSELL, JEFFREY BEARD, DANIEL BURNS and others
HOEY v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
CASEY LEE HOEY
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IDEEN v. RENDELL et al
as 1:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
ABDUL IDEEN
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, JEFFERY A. BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
