Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant:
SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spruill v. Reid et al
as 5:2023ct03267
Plaintiff:
William Spruill
Defendant:
Mr. Reid, Captain Graham and Officer Futrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. [FNU] CO. DANFORD
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
[FNU] CO. DANFORD, JOHN DOE, [FNU] ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Bullard
as 5:2023ct03104
Plaintiff:
Allen Littlejohn
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03119
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
J. Bullard, Mr. Jacobs, Franklin Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Graham
as 5:2022ct03164
Plaintiff:
Barwon Farmer
Defendant:
Franklin Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meader v. SHU Correctional Officers et al
as 5:2022ct03118
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leon Meader
Defendant:
SHU Correctional Officers, Brandon Wyche, Nurse A. Eddins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
