Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00642
Plaintiff:
Griffith Alfred Jones
Defendant:
Autauga County Metro Jail and Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
E. Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00321
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
LPN Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Captain Jenkins, Rene Mason, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Harris et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
E. Harris, Officer Holincey, Correctional Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jason Jermaine Hall
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Cam Ward, Mike Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Prentiss Griffith Detention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Herman Richard Corley, Jr.
Defendant:
Prentiss Griffith Detention Center , Heath Taylor , William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. O'Nell et al
as 2:2009cv00913
Plaintiff:
James W Griffith
Defendant:
Michael O'Nell, Bob Riley, J Randall McNeill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
