Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Coleman v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2014cv05508
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Coleman
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffrey Beard, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde # 233841 v. McClellen et al
as 2:2013cv01742
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Clyde
Defendant:
Unknown McClellen, Unknown Hanson, E Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp #194939 v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv01744
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sharp
Defendant:
E Williams, Unknown Honeybone, Unknown Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Hamilton v. J. Rodriguez, et al
as 13-15891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE HAMILTON
Defendant:
J. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer and H. GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
T. SELBY, N. WALKER, J. MCCALL and others
Hamilton v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2012cv04697
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lamar Hamilton
Defendant:
T. Rodriguez, H. Gonzalez, T. Selby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
T Rodriguez, H. Gonzalez, T. Selby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 3:2011cv03397
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hall
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison, Mathew Cate, A. Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armando Ortiz v. Suzan Hubbard, et al
as 10-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO R. ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZAN HUBBARD, M. S. EVANS, M. MOORE and others
Ortiz v. Hubbard et al
as 4:2009cv05927
Plaintiff:
Armando R. Ortiz
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard, M. S. Evans, M. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candler v. Vazquez et al
as 3:2008cv02320
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Candler
Defendant:
J. B. Vazquez, H. Gonzalez, D. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
