Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gladney v. Madrid, et al
as 4:2020cv00360
Defendant:
K Lewis, D Madrid, Van Devender and others
Plaintiff:
Edward J Gladney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 18-16621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Jeremy Pinson v. Ivey, et al
as 18-16169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
IVEY, Officer, DOES, named as: Unknown Parties Officer 1 and Officer 2, J. ESPINOZA, SIS Technician and others
Danny Fabricant v. J. Shartle
as 18-15995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY FABRICANT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 17-17420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN MARCUM, CO, USP Tucson, UNKNOWN JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Danny Fabricant v. J. Shartle
as 16-17339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY JOSEPH FABRICANT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv08113
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01784
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Agramonte, et al v. J. Shartle
as 10-3760
Plaintiff:
PEDRO AGRAMONTE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON WHITMAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
