Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howlet v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Howlet
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Hines v. Kim Thomas, et al
as 13-14184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CURTIS HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM THOMAS, JAMES DELOACH, CYNTHIA WHITE and others
Tony Smith v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 13-11173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TERRANCE MCDONNELL, Associate Commissioner for the Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Harrison v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Harrison
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Phelix Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenner v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Bradley Kenner
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Gwendolyn Mosely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Tyus et al
as 1:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Reginald Stinson
Defendant:
Kenneth Tyus, James DeLoach, Tony Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , James Deloach , Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Thomas et al
as 1:2011cv00644
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curtis Hines
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, James DeLoach, Cynthia A. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
