Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 17-3166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C/0 PEGRAM, official/personal capacity), SHELLY MANKEY, (official/personal capacity) and others
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 17-3165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, (Official/personal capacity), CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, MBA, MHA (official/personal capacity) and others
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department Of Cor, et al
as 17-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORREALE STEVENS, Personal Capacity, JAMES J. FITZGERALD, III, Personal Capacity, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01580
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PEGRAM, SHELLEY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BYUNGHAK JIN, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
