Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kent v. Unknown Party
as 3:2023cv08122
Plaintiff:
Daniel W Kent
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deetz v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00966
Defendant:
Unknown Salyer, Corizon Health Services Incorporated, Kent Ainslie and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett J Deetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2017cv03010
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa, City of and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cofield #P46955 v. Volkmer et al
as 2:2017cv02860
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cofield
Defendant:
Kent Volkmer, Arizona State Prison Complex, Browning, F Peckinpaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zainulabadin #273511 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01987
Plaintiff:
Pardis Zainulabadin
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Party, J Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris # 113830 v. Vaught et al
as 2:2016cv01552
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Barbara Vidal Vaught and Kent E Cattani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Orozco #260141 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Luis Felipe Orozco
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman # 229191 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01302
Plaintiff:
James Ward Chapman, III
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson #235832 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
Harold Edwin Ferguson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dutcher #067784 v. Ryan
as 2:2015cv01079
Plaintiff:
Robert William Dutcher
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samuel Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
