Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Hines v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Fox, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Collins v. Mitchel et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Collins
Defendant:
Mitchel, Fox, Gary Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Dunn et al
as 5:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marquis Keonta Blount
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Dennis Stamper, Matthew Brand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Santa Maria et al
as 4:2021cv01698
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Defendant:
Seargent Santa Maria and Captain Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Williams
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Arnaldo Mercado, Scott Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Thompkins et al
as 4:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Charles E Walker
Defendant:
Steve Thompkins, B Robinson, Lt. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Cargle et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Warden Cargle, Lt. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
John Willie Malone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv00337
Defendant:
Latoya Scott, Baker, Malone and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dailey v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Mr. Ellis, Camille Luckie, Pamela Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Malon Jermaine Dailey and Marlon Jermaine Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
