Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MURPHY v. PAGE et al
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS, OFFICER KENNETH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Dance
as 5:2023ct03238
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Murphy
Defendant:
Sergeant Dance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023ct03143
Plaintiff:
El-Amin Bashir
Defendant:
Warden William Holzapfel, Unit Manager Chanelle Newsom, Case Manager Gilbert Grimaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Pike et al
as 5:2023ct03083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Hunter Pike, Lt. Willis, Lt. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taffe v. Scott
as 5:2022ct03224
Plaintiff:
Timothy Taffe
Defendant:
C/O Scott, Warden King, Warden Scarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murphy v. Mail Room Staff
as 5:2022ct03004
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lafon Murphy
Defendant:
Mail Room Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Meyers v. Boxer et al
as 5:2021ct03211
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Captain Boxer, Lt. Mosley, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
