Cases 1 - 10 of 25
SIRLS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL NURSES STAFF
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
JAMES SIRLS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL NURSES STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, Sergeant MOORE and Sergeant FELICIA MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
HERRON LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and COLUMBUS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UPSHAW v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
UCASHA UPSHAW, SR
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, PUGH, ZHG GANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
RANDY JOHNSON
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE J BRYANT
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUTIERREZ v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FELIX GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL K WHITAKER
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWSTER v. TOMPKINS et al
as 4:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Lieutentant HOLLOWAY, RACHELLE HUNTER, Sheriff DONNA TOMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCRUGGS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2019cv00101
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALAN SCRUGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
