Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Simmons v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00759
Plaintiff:
Christopher Norris Simmons
Defendant:
Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and Chilton County Jail Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiminez v. Martin et al
as 7:2020cv01038
Defendant:
Tony Murray, Don Martin and Richard Norris
Plaintiff:
Mario Jiminez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poores v. Abernathy et al
as 7:2019cv01929
Defendant:
Ron Abernathy, Norris, Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Poores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Robinson et al
as 5:2019cv01455
Defendant:
D. Robinson, Gwendolyn Givens, Karla Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Norris et al
as 7:2016cv01169
Plaintiff:
Mose Franklin Hill
Defendant:
Norris and Wheelus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Dozier et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Bertha Dozier, Nurse Norris, M. Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Norris et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00490
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Nurse Norris, K. Washington, Vivian Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
