Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JANE DOE, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwager v. Norristown State Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv03978
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Schwager
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and Jessie Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott Sumter v. Keith
as 22-630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosemary Scott Sumter, Saw Creek and Pine Ridge Indian Communities Tribal Council Member
Defendant / Appellee:
Jessica Keith, CEO of Norristown State Hospital, Craig Lowe, Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility and Raymond Tonkin, District Attorney of Pike County
DAVIS v. CHESTER CROZER HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2021cv05035
Plaintiff:
JERRY DAVIS and DANIEL VINCENT BRUNDAGE
Defendant:
CHESTER CROZER HOSPITAL, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLAMER v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv04012
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLAMER
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, HARRSCH and LISA NOVAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALL v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015cv01847
Plaintiff:
DAWN BALL
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, EDNA MCCUTCHIN, JOHN DOE DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Wadis v. Norristown State Hospital, et al
as 14-4097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WADIS
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, THEODORE and ISAIAH
WADIS v. THE NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2013cv05812
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WADIS
Defendant:
THE NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, THEODORE and ISAIAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRESSLEY v. SCI AT DALLAS et al
as 2:2013cv04857
Plaintiff:
DALACEY PRESSLEY
Defendant:
SCI AT DALLAS, LUZERNE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
