Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv50413
Defendant:
Sgt. Mrs. Rodriguez, Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Heferfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guitron v. Noonan et al
as 2:2018cv01072
Defendant:
Sgt Rosenthal, Officer Linjer, Sgt Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Jorge Guitron, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peaches v. Beachem et al
as 1:2017cv03003
Plaintiff:
Brojrick Peaches
Defendant:
Superintendent Beachem, Commander Tate, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porche v. Hudson
as 1:2013cv03492
Plaintiff:
Monzura Porche
Defendant:
Officer Hudson and Officer Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sartin v. Meyer
as 1:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
Leandrew Sartin
Defendant:
Officer Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse v. Cook County Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv02706
Plaintiff:
Darron Rouse
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections, Tom Dart, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Wallace v. Wesley Smith, et al
as 11-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON MORRIS WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY SMITH, Dr., Individually and in his official capacity, JOHN C. COOPER, SUSAN R. BOLTON and others
Gillon v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INGMAR GILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN BLAKE DAVIS, US PENITENTIARY FLORENCE COLORADO and others
Davis v. Dodge County Sheriff et al
as 2:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Donald Davis
Defendant:
Dodge County Sheriff, Todd Nehls, Officer Covington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pickle et al
as 2:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Manuel Williams
Defendant:
Officer Pickle, Officer Fullmer, Officer Kazick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
