Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PEREZ v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
RAMON PEREZ
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN BERRY, LIEUTENANT FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez et al v. Milton et al
as 4:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Mr. Cirone and Mr. Milton
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Eduardo Perez and William Lloyd Holtzclaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Laughlin et al
as 3:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Zenas Perez Lee
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eduardo R. Perez
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, Suzanne R. Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallardo-Perez v. Johns et al
as 5:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jose Gallardo-Perez
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, Sarah Ridgeway and George Zoley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallarado-Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jose Gallarado-Perez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T. Johns, Craig Chalmers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mascurro et al v. The Geo Group Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Juan Perez Mascurro, Jose Gutierrez, Guillermo Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc., Tracy Johns, Jessica M. Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Frias v. Johns et al
as 5:2013cv00021
Petitioner:
Pedro Ruben Perez-Frias
Respondent:
T. Johns and DHS-ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. McIntosh County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Raul Beltran Perez
Defendant:
McIntosh County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
