Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 7:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Todd Hall, Justin White, Hasty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Humliz et al
as 7:2021cv01269
Plaintiff:
Eric Hugh Bonner
Defendant:
Caleb Andy Humliz, Pickens County Sheriff's Department, Alabama Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Heritage et al
as 7:2021cv01100
Plaintiff:
Roderick Darnell Carter
Defendant:
A. G. Heritage, Pickens County Judicial System, Pickens County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earvin v. Hall et al
as 7:2021cv00983
Plaintiff:
Clint E Earvin
Defendant:
Todd Hall, Pickens County Sheriff Department and Andy Hamlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 0:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Townsend
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Pickens County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Pickens County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv02482
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Miller
Defendant:
Pickens County Sheriff's Department, Rick Clark and Keith Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers v. Pickens County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2015cv01490
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lyvonne Ayers
Defendant:
Pickens County Sheriff's Department and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Pickens County District Attorney et al
as 2:2012cv01991
Plaintiff:
Leroy Gibson
Defendant:
Pickens County District Attorney, Pickens County Sheriff, Investigator Cocks and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Abston et al
as 7:2011cv01115
Plaintiff:
Walter Melton
Defendant:
David Abston, Greg Carr, Manly Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
