Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ruelas v. Cardinale et al
as 2:2020cv01850
Plaintiff:
Aristeo Ruelas
Defendant:
Unknown Cardinales, Unknown Parties, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruelas v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03159
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ruelas
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thy Vann v. D. Tapia, et al
as 16-17251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THY VANN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. TAPIA, J. VASQUEZ, A. VASQUEZ and others
Ruelas v. Cook County Department Of Corrections
as 1:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Omar Ruelas
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Tapia et al
as 1:2013cv05454
Plaintiff:
Thy Vann
Defendant:
D. Tapia, J. Vasquez, A. Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruelas v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Aristeo Antonio Sanches Ruelas
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Wiesinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01276
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Aristeo Antonio Sanches Ruelas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00960
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patrick Ruelas
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Robert Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruelas v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patrick Ruelas
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Dawn Northup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario Louis Navarro v. Matthew Cate et al
as 5:2012cv01260
Defendant:
Darral Adams, Mr. Allen, V. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Navarro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
