Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Rushing, Unknown Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Olson v. Pinal, County of et al
as 2:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Trinity Olson
Defendant:
Pinal, County of, J Alcantar, Unknown Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seneca #113423 v. Koeppel et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Michael Seneca
Defendant:
Cynthia M Koeppel, Quinn Harvey, Alfred Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumper v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel E Jumper
Defendant:
United States of America, Catricia Howard, Unknown Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conroy v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02458
Defendant:
B Schmid, Unknown Harris, Jessica Todd and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Conroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddards v. Maricopa County Jails et al
as 2:2017cv04123
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rush Eddards
Defendant:
Maricopa County Jails, Towers Jail and Lower Buckeye Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Babeu et al
as 2:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Copeland, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Babeu, Unknown Hudson, Unknown Schlebaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeKenipp v. Babeu et al
as 2:2014cv01971
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew DeKenipp
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Unknown Kimble, Unknown Valenzuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Garrett M Rushing
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Heard, Unknown Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rushing v. Unknown Party
as 2:2010cv02126
Plaintiff:
Jasper P Rushing
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
