Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Colwell v. Schwarz et al
as 6:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Chad Colwell
Defendant:
LEO Matthew Schwarz, LEO John Doe 1 and LEO John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scheurich v. Ford County et al
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
David E Scheurich
Defendant:
Ford County, Ford County Sheriff's Office, Mark Doran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. FILIPI et al
as 3:2021cv04691
Plaintiff:
LARRY JAMES TAYLOR
Defendant:
FILIPI, SWANSON, ZULLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY et al
as 5:2021cv00091
Defendant:
H BUTLER, PARMELE, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY and others
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS L ANDERSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARCELONA v. BURKES
as 3:2020cv05356
Defendant:
W SCHWARZ, A KEATON and H BURKES
Plaintiff:
JOEL BARCELONA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, LaTosha Charles, Morgan Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton, Jr. v. Pfeister et al
as 1:2018cv05113
Defendant:
Warden Nicholson, C Owikoti, R. Elazegui and others
Plaintiff:
Tenniel Wyatt and George Edward Crayton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Binkele et al
as 3:2018cv04098
Defendant:
K. Rawhoof, J. Makela, W. Schwarz and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Vaughn Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwarz #204788 v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 2:2018cv01406
Plaintiff:
Paul Schwarz
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01670
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, John Baldwin, Randy Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Florencio Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
