Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00379
Respondent:
George Jr Harrigan, Craig Maguire, Amanda Lane and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00764
Defendant:
Jamie K Davis, Robert Ant Delitta, Samantha L. English and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv22782
Defendant:
Jennifer J. Ferraro, Lacie N. Mcanally, George Jr Harrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BRYANT
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, MS LESLEY and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE KELLY
Defendant:
CHIP W SIMMONS, M HOUSAM and RAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. HILL et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
OBRIAN ALEXAND HILL and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
JELO ACEVEDO and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. WEBB et al
as 3:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAMES R WEBB, C SIMMONS and T ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
