Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JOHNSON v. ASHER et al
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
EVERETT JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
JERRY ASHER, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02466
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGLE, BOB BUGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALVAREZ et al v. JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2018cv00234
Plaintiff:
CALEB MEADOWS, NICHOLAS MICHAEL TUCKER, KEANAN VAUGHN and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2017cv02247
Defendant:
ASHLEY, GREEN, K. GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEROTTI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 2:2015cv00067
Defendant:
GARY ALLRED, M. ANDREIS, BOND and others
Debtor-in-Posse:
SGT. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. PEROTTI and PATRICK J. ROSELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCDAVID v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00272
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, JENNIFER BRISEN, GRAHAM BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDAVID v. BAKER et al
as 2:2014cv00264
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BUTCH BAKER, JENNIFER BRISEN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER-BOLES v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2012cv00478
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER AMANDA KINYON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERT GUNN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TODD FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
TAMRA TUCKER-BOLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
