Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sherman v. Perkins et al
as 4:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Perkins, Franklin, Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division et al
as 5:2023cv05047
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lonnell Sherman
Defendant:
The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrick Nooner v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 16-3157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrick Terrell Nooner
Defendant - Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Governor of Arkansas, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Attorney and others
Nooner v. Hutchinson et al
as 5:2016cv05142
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelly, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Benjamin v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Benjamin
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, A.D.C. Director, William Straughn, Warden, Maurice Williams, Major and others
Charles White v. Lynn Ollar, et al
as 13-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Bruce White
Defendant - Appellee:
Lynn Ollar, Transport Supervisor, United States Marshal, Eastern District of Arkansas, Doc Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, John Does, Chief of USMS from Nov. 2009-2011, and 1,2,3 and others
Jimmy Cantrell v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 12-3371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
Jimmy Cantrell v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 11-2993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
