Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv03083
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv03083
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Warden, USP Thomson et al
as 3:2024cv50188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Defendant:
Warden, USP Thomson and R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McShan v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jawon McShan
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodwin v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
D'Andre Brown v. FBOP, et al
as 24-5403
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE ROLAND BROWN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE #1, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary, JOHN DOE #2, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary and others
Thompson v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Thompson
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
