Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Butler v. Padula et al
as 4:2012cv03185
Plaintiff:
Lavadre Dashun Butler
Defendant:
Warden Padula and Officer working at Lee County in the northside of Darlington dorm 11/8/10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kendall Green v. Sgt. Anderson
as 12-6802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENDALL GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT ANDERSON, of Lee Correctional Institution, JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC, LIEUTENANT RICHARDSON, SMU Security and others
Billy Tedder v. Sgt. Johnson
as 12-6687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY JOE TEDDER
Defendant - Appellee:
SGT. JOHNSON, MARGRETT BELL, Associate Warden of Security, WARDEN PADULA and others
Brooks v. Dennis et al
as 4:2011cv03362
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
Mr Dennis, Maj Dean, Warden Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-7254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
Clavon Jones v. Captain Thoma
as 11-6772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAVON D. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN THOMAS, LIEUTENANT BRADLEY, WARDEN PADULA and others
Sarratt v. Byars et al
as 8:2011cv00979
Defendant:
Byars, Warden McCall, Warden Padula and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sarratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
