Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jones v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Dewon Clarniel Jones
Defendant:
YesCare Corp. and Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hensley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Hensley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Wilcotte Rahming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 6:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Wilcotte Rahming and Manuel Pouparinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crandle v. Blessing et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00627
Plaintiff:
James Olester Crandle
Defendant:
Dr. Blessing, Jean Darbouze, Wilcotte Rahming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Jenny John, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Lewis et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Officer Freeman, Officer Morgan, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Javonta C. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Orr et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00757
Defendant:
Nurse Orr, Alabama Department of Corrections and Wilcotte Rahming
Plaintiff:
Tracy Roy Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilcotte Rahming, Alabama Department of Corrections and Kilby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleberry v. Rahming (INMATE 1) (MEMBER)
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
Adam Castleberry
Defendant:
Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Rahming (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00652
Plaintiff:
Darrell Burgess
Defendant:
Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.