Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Walter Pegues v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 17-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, JENNIFER BLAESING, JOSEPH HANKINS and others
Roache v. DeRosa et al
as 17-705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter J. Roache
Defendant - Appellee:
Nicholas DeRosa
Defendant:
Randy I Siper and Richard N. Lentino
Walter Pegues v. Joshua Billingsley, et al
as 16-3654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA BILLINGSLEY and GREGG SCOTT
Pegues et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2016cv04201
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues and Joseph R Racanelli
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Jennifer Blaesing, Joesph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Goodstein et al
as 4:2016cv02837
Plaintiff:
Dennie Roger Bates
Defendant:
Diane S Goodstein, Dr Hedgepath, Holly Scaturo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Pegues v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 16-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Senior Public Service Administrator, DANIELLE WALKER, Director of Nursing, SHON C. ORRILL and others
Walter Pegues v. James Dimas, et al
as 16-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DIMAS, Secretary of the Illinois Department of Human Services, GREGG SCOTT, Senior Program Director, LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION and others
Pegues v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04168
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pegues v. Mitchell-Lawshea et al
as 4:2015cv04106
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell-Lawshea, Michael Bednarz, Danielle Walker-Low and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04097
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Dothan Rogers, Jeffrey Alan Hargett and others
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg A. Scott, Michael Bednarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
