Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Lieberman v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04022
Plaintiff:
Brad Lieberman
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc., James Dimas, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Roy et al
as 0:2017cv04544
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevens
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Joan Fabain, Jeffery Pederson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rivas et al
as 5:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
Lorne Lee Clark
Defendant:
Suzan Rivas, Tiffany Maybanks, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04232
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant:
James T Dimas, Gregg Scott, W Pennock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamaal Bilal v. FNU Fennick, et al
as 17-12062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL, f.k.a. John L. Burton, a.k.a. Superman
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU FENNICK, FCCC Shift Supervisor, FNU CLARKE, C.O., MARK SNYDER, FCCC Investigator and others
Bilal v. Fennick et al
as 2:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Ali Bilal
Defendant:
FNU Fennick, FNU Clarke, Mark Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Schuyler County et al
as 4:2016cv04204
Plaintiff:
Terry C. Johnson
Defendant:
Schuyler County, James Chris Clayton, Jerry J. Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pegues et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2016cv04201
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues and Joseph R Racanelli
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Jennifer Blaesing, Joesph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Jackson et al
as 4:2016cv04171
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Reynolds
Defendant:
Michael Jackson, Amy Clark, Dawn Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Orrill et al
as 4:2016cv04170
Plaintiff:
Greg Morris
Defendant:
Shon Orrill, David Berry, Brandon Wear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
