Cases 21 - 30 of 187
Thomas Powers v. Aramark Food Services Corp., et al
as 22-2951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, ASHLEY ADWELL and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Thomas v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Melinda Masters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett Thomas v. Robin Jackson
as 22-7153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARNETT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN JACKSON, J. C. HOLLAND, WARDEN SCARANTINO and others
Larry Brown v. Doug Bellile, et al
as 22-2680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY J. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG BELLILE, DANIEL KATTENBRAKER, LAURA THOMAS and others
Powers v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, Ashley Adwell and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Lodge et al
as 4:2022cv04131
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paula Lodge and Shan Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Shah et al
as 4:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, IDHS/TDF Medical Director and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fanady v. Dart
as 1:2022cv04180
Plaintiff:
Steve Fanady
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Beadle et al
as 2:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
F. Beadle, R. Pace and R. Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Daywitt, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-2484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas Luhmann and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jodi Harpstead, in their official and individual capacities, Nancy Johnston, in their official and individual capacities, Kathryn Schesso, in their official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
