Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement Cases filed in Washington
Cases 41 - 50 of 95
McReynolds v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05161
Plaintiff: Jesse McReynolds
Defendant: Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Strong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05137
Plaintiff: Troy E Belcher
Defendant: Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean v. Strong et al
as 3:2017cv05121
Plaintiff: Chad Bean
Defendant: Mark Strong and William Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Strong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05989
Plaintiff: William Curry, Jr
Defendant: Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Michael Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaghe v. Lashway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05973
Plaintiff: Sam Donaghe
Defendant: Patrisha Lashway, Kevin Quigley, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Strong et al
as 3:2016cv05961
Plaintiff: Tremayne Francis
Defendant: Mark Strong , Cathi Harris , Paul Trem Powski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Van Hook We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05874
Plaintiff: Burt Daniels
Defendant: Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pisoni v. Strong We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05854
Plaintiff: John L Pisoni
Defendant: Mark Strong and William Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Pacific County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05791
Petitioner: Richard Roy Scott
Respondent: Pacific County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Van Hook We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05785
Plaintiff: Richard Roy Scott
Defendant: Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?