Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Lovejoy v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2016cv02468
Plaintiff:
David Josef Lovejoy
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Minnesota Sex Offender Program , Edward Kesty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2016cv02340
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Mason and Ryan Richard Swenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Emily Johnson-Piper , Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggert v. Ovsak et al
as 0:2014cv01677
Plaintiff:
William Eggert
Defendant:
Keri A. Ovsak, Andy Kvien, Lisa Nygren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickner v. Rose et al
as 0:2012cv01397
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Julie Rose, Thomas Lundquist, Katherine Klancher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Eberhardt
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Parsons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Brandy Owen Lewis
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Jackson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
Anthony Green
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
