Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Urbanek v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2023cv00657
Petitioner:
Edward E. Urbanek
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Lindlbauer et al
as 0:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Brooks
Defendant:
David A. Lindlbauer, Jana Brister-Korby, Charles S. Fai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv01798
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judah v. Ovsak et al
as 0:2021cv00618
Defendant:
Joseph Witz, Nicole Oachs, Terrance Kneisel and others
Plaintiff:
Willim Judah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Brandy Owen Lewis
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warbington v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
James E. Warbington
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Darrin Edward Dotson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
