Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Corpus v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2024cv00174
Petitioner:
Andrew Corpus
Respondent:
Florida Department of Children and Families, Dr. Carrole DePass, Dr. Robin J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Yen et al
as 2:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Doctor Le Yen and Ms. Gardener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daywitt et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt, Joseph Franciosa Thomas, Kenneth Gernard Parks and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Jannine Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corpus v. Monsalud et al
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Mary Monsalud, Colonel Baker and Ms Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv05514
Plaintiff:
Bob Andrew Pugh and Lisa Marie Pugh
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services, Kevin Devos and John Hamill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Corpus v. Secretary, Department of Children & Families, et al
as 22-12181
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW CORPUS
Respondent / Appellee:
JON CARNER, DAVIDSON, FLORES and others
Corpus v. Monsalud et al
as 2:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Mary Monsalud, Riddle and Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Fitzpatrick
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Ms. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
