Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodson v. United States of America, The
as 0:2023cv03569
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Hodson
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Lindlbauer et al
as 0:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Brooks
Defendant:
David A. Lindlbauer, Jana Brister-Korby, Charles S. Fai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02606
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Prouty
Defendant:
David N. Miles, Matt Dahl, Derek J. Koecher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles
as 0:2021cv02460
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
