Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Thomas E. Perez v. YN Apparel, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
David Um and YN Apparel, Inc.
Perez v. San Miguel Homes for the Elderly, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv05556
Defendant:
San Miguel Homes for the Elderly, LLC, Precilla San Miguel, Teofilo Cris Sanque and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Thomas E. Perez v. J and L Metal Polishing Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01957
Defendant:
J and L Metal Polishing Inc, Julian Navarro and Julian Navarro
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Keston Abe et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2015cv08751
Plaintiff:
Keston Abe, Francisco Acevedo, Patrick Ahern-Price and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Thomas E. Perez v. i2A Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv04963
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
i2A Technologies, Inc and Victor Batinovich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas E Perez v. Leo s Recycling, Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv07628
Defendant:
Gloria Cordova, Leo s Recycling, Inc and Brigida Rios
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Thomas E Perez v. National Consolidated Couriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03224
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
National Consolidated Couriers, Inc., Tanweer Ahmed, Ironstone NCCI Logistics and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Julie Jones et al v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 2:2015cv04739
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ASO Michael L Wolfram
Plaintiff:
Bobbi E. Pollak and Julie Jones
Defendant:
Transcend Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. TLC Residential Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02776
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
TLC Residential Inc and Francisco Montero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2015cv01026
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Tanweer Ahmed and National Consolidated Couriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.