Cases 111 - 120 of 191
Singletary v. PMAB, LLC
as 3:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ganaaya Singletary
Defendant:
PMAB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
WHERRY V. FORSTYH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv01107
Plaintiff:
KATHERN WHERRY
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Munchel v. Red Coats, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00615
Defendant:
Red Coats, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Munchel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Coker v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Gene Coker
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Harris v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
Katherine Harris
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, North Carolina Teachers and State Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SKEEN v. CAROLINA CONTAINER CO. CORP. et al
as 1:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SKEEN
Defendant:
CAROLINA CONTAINER CO. CORP. , CAROLINA CONTAINER COMPANY, INC. and CAROLINA CONTAINER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Tracy A Williams
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Campbell v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
James Edward Campbell
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOLDER V. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
LAUREN N. HOLDER
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER , WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES and WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH
Counter_claimant:
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH , WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES and WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Counter_defendant:
LAUREN N. HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Stairwalt v. TIAA
as 3:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Troy Daniel Stairwalt
Defendant:
TIAA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
