Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Kappel v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09087
Plaintiff:
Andre Kappel
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Christopher Hrubec
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jackson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jonah Jackson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Shane Serritt and Josh Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Steward v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv22448
Plaintiff:
Willie Steward
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mathews v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Adrian Mathews
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Richard Devore v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 22-5638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD DEVORE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO.
Conod v. UPS, Co. et al
as 6:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
John Conod
Defendant:
UPS, Co. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as United Parcel Service, Andrew Sokolowski and Lee Longacre
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Walton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M. Walton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Green v. UPS, Co.
as 0:2021cv61763
Defendant:
UPS, Co., United Parcel Service Co. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ira Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Gresch v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05383
Defendant:
Marty Perricone and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gresch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Peak v. Tramnel et al
as 1:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Ernest Tramnel and United Parcel Service
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Peak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
