Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Gingerella v. Marguerite Concrete, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv10886
Plaintiff:
Neil Gingerella
Defendant:
Marguerite Concrete, Inc. and James Marguerite
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Summersill v. Kelly
as 5:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
Tracie Summersill
Defendant:
Neil Kelly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Shirley Flores et al v. First Transit Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03309
Plaintiff:
Miguel Herrera, Ernest M Verano, La Trina Purnell and others
Defendant:
First Transit Inc, First Transit Transportation, First Transit and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Robert Hencel, et al v. Allied Container Systems, Inc.
as 12-55026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT NEIL HENCEL, SCOTT COSNER and DENNIS MEYERS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLIED CONTAINER SYSTEMS, INC.
Coppett v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 5:2011cv04227
Plaintiff:
Johnny Coppett
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, Tom Kilgore, Dennis Bottorff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Robert Hencel et al v. Allied Container Systems Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01557
Defendant:
Allied Container Systems Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Scott Cosner, Robert Neil Hencel and Dennis Meyers
Leslie O Neil v. Iverness Medical Innovations et al
as 2:2011cv02338
Defendant:
Alere Inc, Biosite, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie O Neil
LUNDY et al v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
as 2:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F LUNDY , DAVID FRASER , NEIL F SORENSEN and others
Defendant:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neil J. Patrone v. Plasma Procurement Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03429
Petitioner:
Neil J. Patrone
Respondent:
Plasma Procurement Services, Inc., Plasma Procurement Services, Inc. and Octapharma, AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
