Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Philip Paymer v. Everybody's Inc., et al
as 13-13706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP PAYMER
Defendant - Appellee:
EVERYBODY'S INC., ANDREW KURLANSKY and DONALD ROBBINS
Trustees of the Roofers' and Waterproofers' Local No. 44 Pension Plan v. HC Nationwide LLC, et al.
as 1:2013cv01595
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Local No. 44 Pension Plan
Defendant:
HC Nationwide LLC and J.L. Robbins Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Paymer v. Everybody's Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04297
Plaintiff:
Philip Paymer
Defendant:
Everybody's Inc. , Andrew Kurlansky , Donald Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUBER et al v. LOUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01473
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
LOUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HUBER et al v. ROYAL BISCUIT COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01428
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
ROYAL BISCUIT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Robbins v. Server Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00743
Defendant:
PDUs Direct, LLC and Server Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUBER et al v. HOSTESS BRANDS, INC
as 2:2011cv01276
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
HOSTESS BRANDS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ROBBINS et al v. OTTO C. RODE, INC.
as 1:2011cv04741
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBBINS , ANTHONY BENIGNO , ROY KAISER and others
Defendant:
OTTO C. RODE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBBINS et al
as 2:2011cv04006
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ERIC M. ROBBINS, KENNETH LEIBOVITZ and JEFFREY LEIBOVITZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HUBER et al v. DONALDSON SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT CO.
as 2:2011cv00811
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
DONALDSON SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
